Sustainable energy applications in stenter machines in Germany a bibliometric analysis of research trends
Main Article Content
Abstract
The textile industry is among the most energy-intensive sectors, with stenter machines playing a critical role in drying, heat-setting, and finishing. These machines consume significant thermal energy and represent an essential focus for sustainability and decarbonization. Although numerous studies have addressed heat recovery, efficiency, and emission reduction, no bibliometric evaluation has targeted Germany. This study applies bibliometric methods to examine sustainable energy applications in stenter machines in Germany from 1990 to 2025. Data were retrieved from Web of Science and Scopus using a topic–country strategy and analyzed with the Bibliometrix R package. The analysis considered publication output, leading authors, institutions, journals, keyword networks, citation structures, and collaboration patterns. Results indicate three phases: an early stage (1992–2004), a local peak (2005), and renewed growth (2018–2023), consistent with Germany’s Energiewende framework. Industrial journals such as Melliand Textilberichte dominate publication venues, while Brückner Trockentechnik GmbH and Monforts Textilmaschinen GmbH emerge as central contributors. Keyword analysis reveals two thematic axes: equipment–process optimization (airflow, drying, heat transfer) and energy recovery–efficiency (heat exchangers, waste heat utilization, energy conservation), increasingly tied to decarbonization. Citation analysis shows a right-skewed distribution, where a few methodological papers provide long-term visibility and guide applied studies. Overall, German research on stenter machines is industry-driven and practice-oriented, closely aligned with national energy transition policies. Yet gaps remain in benchmarking protocols, low-carbon heat integration, advanced control strategies, and life cycle assessment. These findings highlight both the strengths of current research and the opportunities for future contributions to industrial sustainability.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. International Energy Agency. (2020). Energy technology perspectives 2020. Paris: IEA.
2. Hasanbeigi, A. (2010). Energy-efficiency improvement opportunities for the textile industry (Report No. LBNL-3970E). Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
3. Hussain, T., Khan, M. A., & Ali, F. (2020). Waste heat recovery and energy saving potential in textile stenter machines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118132
4. Yildiz, H., Kaya, A., & Kaplan, M. A. (2021). Experimental investigation of thermal performance in textile stenter machines with heat recovery system. Heat and Mass Transfer, 57(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-020-02914-4
5. Cay, A. (2007). Exergetic performance assessment of a stenter system in textile finishing. International Journal of Energy Research, 31(3), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.1249
6. Patel, N. G., Shendage, D. J., Doctor, S., & Basu, S. K. (2021). Energy model-based benchmarking of the drying process in the stenter machine. Drying Technology, 39(8), 964–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2020.1740819
7. Gelir, B. Ç., & Ceylan, H. (2021). The effect of the heat recovery on fuel consumption in the stenter machine. Thermal Science, 25(2A), 1047–1055. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI200211046G
8. Ciappi, D. (2019). Air curtain-based energy saving in textile stenter dryers. Energies, 12(3), 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030482
9. Hussain, T., Khan, M. A., & Ali, F. (2020). Carbon emission mitigation potential in stenter processes through waste heat recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118133
10. Erdoğan, M., & Şentürk Acar, M. (2024). Thermodynamic analysis of a tunnel biscuit oven and heat recovery system. WAPRIME, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14930792
11. International Energy Agency. (2020). Germany 2020: Energy policy review. Paris: IEA.
12. Gawel, E., Strunz, S., & Lehmann, P. (2014). The German Energiewende under pressure: Is Germany on track to achieve its climate targets? Energy, Sustainability and Society, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-0567-4-10
13. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
14. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
15. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, 178(4060), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4060.471
16. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280
17. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2021). Bibliometrix: Comprehensive science mapping analysis. R Core Team: Vienna, Austria.
18. Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. Sage Open, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
19. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
20. Deng, Z., Chen, Y., & Li, M. (2022). Data cleaning strategies in bibliometric analysis: A review. Scientometrics, 127, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04492-3
21. Arruda, H., Silva, E. R., Lessa, M., Proença Jr, D., & Bartholo, R. (2022). VOSviewer and bibliometrix. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 110(3), 392.