Efficiency and safety in nuclear power plants from a mechanical engineering perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
Nuclear power plants (NPPs) are pivotal to low-carbon electricity generation, but their sustainability depends on advancing both thermodynamic efficiency and engineering-based safety. From a mechanical engineering perspective, the performance of turbines, pumps, heat exchangers, and structural materials directly dictates reliability. Conventional pressurized water reactors (PWRs) and boiling water reactors (BWRs) operate with thermal efficiencies of only 32–35%, constrained by coolant conditions, while advanced high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs) and molten salt reactors (MSRs) can exceed 40%. Exergy analyses consistently identify steam generators, condensers, and turbines as the main sites of irreversibility, emphasizing the need for component-level optimization. Safety remains equally critical. Lessons from Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima underscore the vulnerability of active safety systems and the necessity for passive cooling, reliable pumps and valves, and radiation-resistant materials. Recent advances in computational fluid dynamics (CFD), additive manufacturing, and high-performance alloys are redefining both efficiency and safety margins. Furthermore, climate change—through heatwaves, droughts, and extreme events—poses growing risks to reactor cooling and resilience. This review concludes that integrating thermodynamic optimization, passive safety systems, advanced materials, and digital monitoring technologies is essential for next-generation NPPs. Key research gaps include hybrid thermodynamic cycles, AI-driven diagnostics, and climate adaptation strategies, offering critical directions for academia and industry alike.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2022). Energy, electricity and nuclear power estimates for the period up to 2050. IAEA.
2. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2021). Net zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050
3. Schneider, M., Froggatt, A., Hazemann, J., Katsuta, T., Ramana, M. V., Rodriguez, J. C., ... & Stienne, A. (2016). The world nuclear industry. Status Report.
4. Dincer, I., & Rosen, M. A. (2012). Exergy: energy, environment and sustainable development. Newnes.
5. Lou, J., Wang, J., Li, M., Chen, L., Wang, Y., Du, Y., & Zhao, P. (2023). Thermodynamic performance evaluation and power/cooling energy trade-off estimation of an isolated system driven by nuclear energy. Applied Thermal Engineering, 234, 121263.
6. Zohuri, B., & Fathi, N. (2017). Thermal-hydraulic analysis of nuclear reactors (pp. 1-835). New York: Springer.
7. Erdoğan, M., & Acar, M. Ş. (2024). Thermodynamic analysis of a tunnel biscuit oven and heat recovery system. WAPRIME, 1(1), 1–15.
8. Kemeny, J. G. (1979). Reprot of the President's Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island. The need for change: The Legacy of TMI.
9. Medvedev, Z. (1992). The legacy of Chernobyl. WW Norton & Company.
10. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2015). The Fukushima Daiichi accident: Report by the Director General. IAEA.
11. Adamantiades, A., & Kessides, I. (2009). Nuclear power for sustainable development: current status and future prospects. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5149-5166.
12. Rahman, M. W., Abedin, M. Z., & Chowdhury, M. S. (2023). Efficiency analysis of nuclear power plants: A comprehensive review. World J. Adv. Res. Rev, 19, 527-540.
13. Paydar, A. Z., Balgehshiri, S. K. M., & Zohuri, B. (2023). Advanced reactor concepts (ARC): a new nuclear power plant perspective producing energy. Elsevier.
14. Çelik, C. (2024). Performance analysis of DX and flooded evaporators with eco-friendly refrigerants in medium-scale food storage systems. WAPRIME, 1(1), 16–25.
15. Lu, D., Su, Q., Ju, P., & Lv, L. (2021). Overview on critical heat flux experiment for the reactor fuel assemblies. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 163, 108585.
16. Wang, Q., Liu, C., Luo, R., Li, D., & Macián‐Juan, R. (2022). Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of the combined supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle and organic Rankine cycle‐based nuclear hydrogen production system. International Journal of Energy Research, 46(2), 832-859.
17. Tirogo, I. (2024). Effect of different tilt angles on the performance of the different PV panels in Pouytenga, Burkina Faso. WAPRIME, 1(1), 45–56.
18. Pointer, W. D., Tentner, A., Sofu, T., Weber, D., Lo, S., & Splawski, A. (2007, April). Eulerian two-phase computational fluid dynamics for boiling water reactor core analysis. In Joint International Topical Meeting on Mathematics & Computation and Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications (M&C+ SNA 2007), Monterey, California.
19. Zhang, K. (2020). The multiscale thermal‐hydraulic simulation for nuclear reactors: A classification of the coupling approaches and a review of the coupled codes. International Journal of Energy Research, 44(5), 3295-3315.
20. Ünal, E. K. (2024). Analytical and numerical investigation of viscous heating in parallel-plate Couette flow. WAPRIME, 1(1), 57–69.
21. Álvarez-Fernández, M., del Portillo-Valdés, L., & Alonso-Tristán, C. (2016). Thermal balance of wet-steam turbines in nuclear power plants: a case study. Applied Thermal Engineering, 93, 598-605.
22. De, C., Zhen-Qiang, Y., Ya-Bo, X., & Hong, S. (2014). Numerical study on seismic response of the reactor coolant pump in Advanced Passive Pressurized Water Reactor. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 278, 39-49.
23. Oh, H. W., Yoon, E. S., & Park, S. J. (2006). Hydraulic performance analysis of an axial-flow main coolant pump for the system-integrated nuclear reactor. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 220(6), 635-640.
24. Cooper, M. (2014). Small modular reactors and the future of nuclear power in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 3, 161-177.