Comparative analysis of the effects of expander types on thermodynamic performance in low-temperature waste heat recovery systems (ORC)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The growing global demand for energy efficiency has underscored the significance of recovering industrial waste heat. The Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) stands as the most prevalent method for transforming low-temperature heat sources into electrical energy. This research examines expander technologies, which have a direct impact on the performance of ORC systems. A comparative analysis is conducted between dynamic-type (radial turbine) and volumetric-type (scroll) expanders, focusing on thermodynamic efficiency, operational ranges, and mechanical design limitations. The review concludes that turbines provide efficiency benefits at higher power outputs (exceeding 50 kW), while scroll expanders are more appropriate for small-scale applications (under 10 kW) and fluctuating flow conditions, mainly due to their ability to tolerate liquid presence and their lower cost.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Tchanche, B. F., Lambrinos, G., Frangoudakis, A., & Papadakis, G. (2011). Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles–A review of various applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(8), 3963–3979.
2. International Energy Agency. (2023). Energy efficiency 2023. IEA Publications.
3. Yaman, K., Dölek, S., & Arslan, G. (2025). Performance analysis of a thermoelectric generator (TEG) for waste heat recovery. WAPRIME, 2(1), 13–20.
4. Fırat, M., Okcu, M., & Varol, Y. (2017). Dizel motorlarda yakıta hidrojen katkısının yanma, performans ve emisyonlar üzerine etkilerinin incelenmesi. Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 29(1), 101–107.
5. Ünal, F., & Şentürk Acar, M. (2024). Exergoeconomic analysis of a solar assisted organic Rankine cycle: Case study of Mardin, Turkey. Thermal Science, 00, 192–192.
6. Hung, T. C., Shai, T. Y., & Wang, S. K. (1997). A review of organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) for the recovery of low-grade waste heat. Energy, 22(7), 661–667.
7. Lecompte, S., Huisseune, H., Van Den Broek, M., Vanslambrouck, B., & De Paepe, M. (2015). Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 47, 448-461.
8. Önal, A. S., Etemoğlu, A. B., & Can, M. (2017). Düşük sıcaklıklı atık akışkan destekli organik Rankine çevrimlerinin optimizasyonu. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), 35–52.
9. Quoilin, S., Van Den Broek, M., Declaye, S., Dewallef, P., & Lemort, V. (2013). Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 168–186. EN ISO 16810. (2012). Non-destructive testing — Ultrasonic testing — General principles.
10. Erdoğan, M., & Şentürk Acar, M. (2024). Thermodynamic analysis of a tunnel biscuit oven and heat recovery system. WAPRIME, 1(1), 1–15.
11. Ünal, F., & Özkan, D. B. (2018). Application of exergoeconomic analysis for power plants. Thermal Science, 22(6 Part A), 2653–2666.
12. Karagoz, M., Uysal, C., Agbulut, U., & Saridemir, S. (2021). Exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses of a CI engine fueled with diesel-biodiesel blends containing various metal-oxide nanoparticles. Energy, 214, 118830.
13. Koç, Y., & Yağlı, H. (2020). Isı-Güç kombine sistemlerinde kullanılan Kalina çevriminin enerji ve ekserji analizi. Politeknik Dergisi, 23(1), 181–188.
14. Saleh, B., Koglbauer, G., Wendland, M., & Fischer, J. (2007). Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles. Energy, 32(7), 1210–1221.
15. Bao, J., & Zhao, L. (2013). A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 325–342.
16. Sauret, E., & Rowlands, A. S. (2011). Candidate radial-inflow turbines and high-density working fluids for geothermal power systems. Energy, 36(7), 4460–4467.
17. Campana, C., Cioccolanti, L., Renzi, M., & Caresana, F. (2019). Experimental analysis of a small-scale scroll expander for low-temperature waste heat recovery in Organic Rankine Cycle. Energy, 187, 115929.
18. Lemort, V., Declaye, S., & Quoilin, S. (2012). Experimental characterization of a hermetic scroll expander for use in a micro-scale Rankine cycle. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 226(1), 126–136.
19. Song, P., Wei, M., Shi, L., Danish, S. N., & Ma, C. (2015). A review of scroll expanders for organic Rankine cycle systems. Applied Thermal Engineering, 75, 54–64.
20. Liu, C., Wang, S., Zhang, C., Li, Q., Xu, X., & Huo, E. (2019). Experimental study of micro-scale organic Rankine cycle system based on scroll expander. Energy, 188, 115930.
21. Imran, M., Haglind, F., Asim, M., & Alvi, J. Z. (2018). Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 552–562.
22. Zywica, G., Kaczmarczyk, T. Z., & Ihnatowicz, E. (2016). A review of expanders for power generation in small-scale organic Rankine cycle systems: Performance and operational aspects. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 230(7), 669–684.
23. Bilir, N., Ersoy, H. K., & Hepbaşlı, A. (2011, 13–16 Nisan). Farklı soğutucu akışkanlar için genleştirici olarak ejektör kullanan kompresörlü soğutucunun performans analizi. X. Ulusal Tesisat Mühendisliği Kongresi içinde (ss. 1317–1325). İzmir, Türkiye.