Selection Optimization in Small and Medium-Scale Wind Turbines: A Review Based on Aerodynamic, Mechanical, and Economic Criteria

Main Article Content

Nesrin İlgin Beyazit

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive review that systematically examines the technical, aerodynamic, mechanical, and economic criteria used in the selection of small and medium-scale wind turbines. Turbine performance is evaluated within the framework of the rotor diameter–swept area relationship, tip speed ratio (TSR)–power coefficient (Cp) aerodynamic curves, Weibull wind speed distribution, and power curve parameterization. The fundamental mathematical models employed in annual energy production (AEP) calculations are explained, and the decisive influence of the compatibility between the wind regime and turbine characteristics on overall performance is emphasized. Mechanical components (noise, vibration, generator type) and economic indicators (levelized cost of energy—LCOE, operation and maintenance costs, payback periods) are comparatively assessed with respect to turbine selection. In addition, the performance of multi-criteria decision-making methods (AHP, TOPSIS, VIKOR, CoCoSo) and artificial intelligence-based models (ANN, GRU, CEEMD–GRU) is compared based on findings reported in the literature. The results indicate that hybrid optimization approaches are more effective in reducing uncertainty. The study also identifies future research directions, including turbine classification specific to Türkiye, site validation, and artificial intelligence-assisted real-time optimization.

Article Details

How to Cite
İlgin Beyazit, N. (2026). Selection Optimization in Small and Medium-Scale Wind Turbines: A Review Based on Aerodynamic, Mechanical, and Economic Criteria. WAPRIME, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18299763
Section
Articles

References

1. Tummala, A., Velamati, R. K., Sinha, D. K., Indraja, V., & Krishna, V. (2016). A review on small scale wind turbines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 1351–1371.

2. Calautit, K., & Johnstone, C. (2023). State-of-the-art review of micro to small-scale wind energy harvesting technologies for building integration. Energy Conversion and Management X, 20, 100457.

3. Chagas, C. C. M., Pereira, M. G., Rosa, L. P., da Silva, N. F., de Freitas, M. A. V., & Hunt, J. D. (2020). From megawatts to kilowatts: A review of small wind turbine applications, lessons from the US to Brazil. Sustainability, 12(7), 2760.

4. Rodriguez-Hernandez, O., Martínez, M., Lopez-Villalobos, C., García, H., & Campos-Amezcua, R. (2019). Techno-economic feasibility study of small wind turbines in the Valley of Mexico Metropolitan Area. Energies, 12(5), 890.

5. Bortolini, M., Gamberi, M., Graziani, A., Manzini, R., & Pilati, F. (2013). Performance and viability analysis of small wind turbines in the European Union. Renewable Energy, 62, 629–639.

6. Ermis, K., & Toklu, E. (2022). Design and establishment of a small wind turbine. Journal of Engineering Research and Applied Science, 11, 2084–2092.

7. Bilir, L., İmir, M., Devrim, Y., & Albostan, A. (2015). An investigation on wind energy potential and small scale wind turbine performance at İncek region – Ankara, Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management, 103, 910–923.

8. Özgener, Ö., & Özgener, L. (2007). Exergy and reliability analysis of wind turbine systems: A case study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(8), 1811–1826.

9. Rehman, S., & Khan, S. A. (2016). Fuzzy logic based multi-criteria wind turbine selection strategy—A case study of Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Energies, 9(11), 872.

10. Rehman, S., Khan, S. A., & Alhems, L. M. (2020). Application of TOPSIS approach to multi-criteria selection of wind turbines for on-shore sites. Applied Sciences, 10(21), 7595.

11. Supçiller, A. A., & Toprak, F. (2020). Selection of wind turbines with multi-criteria decision making techniques involving neutrosophic numbers: A case from Turkey. Energy, 207, 118237.

12. Pang, N., Nan, M., Meng, Q., & Zhao, S. (2021). Selection of wind turbine based on fuzzy analytic network process: A case study in China. Sustainability, 13(4), 1792.

13. Yaman, A. (2024). A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making approach (GIS-MCDM) for determination of the most appropriate site selection of onshore wind farm in Adana, Turkey. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 26(12), 4231–4246.

14. Emeksiz, C., & Yüksel, A. (2022). A suitable wind turbine selection for achieving maximum efficiency from wind energy by an adaptive hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach. Journal of New Results in Science, 11(2), 143–158.

15. Şahin, M. D., & Deliktaş, D. (2025). Multi-criteria evaluation of wind turbines using entropy-based TOPSIS and CoCoSo methods: Insights from a Turkish case study. Spectrum of Operational Research, 3(1), 339–356.

16. Eroğlu, Ö., Potur, E. A., Kabak, M., & Gencer, C. (2022). A literature review: Wind energy within the scope of MCDM methods. Gazi University Journal of Science, 36(4), 1578–1595.

17. Türkmen, B. A. (2022). The analysis of climate change awareness at local level in Bilecik. DÜMF Mühendislik Dergisi, 393–402.

18. Torres-Madroñero, J. L., Alvarez-Montoya, J., Restrepo-Montoya, D., Tamayo-Avendaño, J. M., Nieto-Londoño, C., & Sierra-Pérez, J. (2020). Technological and operational aspects that limit small wind turbines performance. Energies, 13(22), 6123.

19. Alam, F., & Jin, Y. (2023). The utilisation of small wind turbines in built-up areas: Prospects and challenges. Wind, 3(4), 418–439.

20. Muhsen, H., Al-Kouz, W., & Khan, W. A. (2019). Small wind turbine blade design and optimization. Symmetry, 12(1), 18.

21. Ashfaq, A., Kamali, Z. H., Agha, M. H., & Arshid, H. (2017). Heat coupling of the pan-European vs. regional electrical grid with excess renewable energy. Energy, 122, 363–377.

22. Gaspar, J. F., Kamarlouei, M., Sinha, A., Xu, H., Calvario, M., Faÿ, F. X., Robles, E., & Soares, C. G. (2016). Speed control of oil-hydraulic power take-off system for oscillating body type wave energy converters. Renewable Energy, 97, 769–783.

23. Sagbas, A., Mazmanoglu, A., & Alp, R. (2013). A decision making model for selection of wind energy production farms based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Electronics Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 3, 473–482.

24. Ghenaï, C. (2025). Sustainability—Hydrogen for sustainable development. In Green energy and technology (pp. 1–25). Springer.

25. Trivellato, F., Battisti, L., & Miori, G. (2012). The ideal power curve of small wind turbines from field data. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 107–108, 263–273.

26. Jin, J., Wen, Q., Cheng, S., Qiu, Y., Zhang, X., & Guo, X. (2022). Optimization of carbon emission reduction paths in the low-carbon power dispatching process. Renewable Energy, 188, 425–438.

27. Abedini, A., Amiri, H., & Karimi, K. (2020). Efficient biobutanol production from potato peel wastes by separate and simultaneous inhibitors removal and pretreatment. Renewable Energy, 160, 269–277.

28. Pagnini, L., Burlando, M., & Repetto, M. P. (2015). Experimental power curve of small-size wind turbines in turbulent urban environment. Applied Energy, 154, 112–121.

29. Amuda, Y. J., Hassan, S., & Subramaniam, U. (2023). Comparative review of energy, crude oil, and natural gas for exchange markets in Nigeria, India and Bangladesh. Energies, 16(7), 3151.

30. Song, D., Tan, X., Deng, X., Yang, J., Dong, M., Elkholy, M. H., Talaat, M., & Joo, Y. H. (2023). Rotor equivalent wind speed prediction based on mechanism analysis and residual correction using Lidar measurements. Energy Conversion and Management, 292, 117385.

31. Zhang, Q., Bashir, M., Miao, W., Liu, Q., Li, C., Yue, M., & Wang, P. (2023). Aerodynamic analysis of a novel pitch control strategy and parameter combination for vertical axis wind turbines. Renewable Energy, 216, 119089.

32. Mushtaq, K., Waris, A., Zou, R., Shafique, U., Khan, N. B., Khan, M. I., Jameel, M., & Khan, M. I. (2024). A comprehensive approach to wind turbine power curve modeling: Addressing outliers and enhancing accuracy. Energy, 304, 131981.

33. Akhmatov, V. (2003). Analysis of dynamic behaviour of electric power systems with large amount of wind power (Doctoral dissertation). Technical University of Denmark.

34. Cheng, J., Ding, L., Lin, R., Liu, M., Zhou, J., & Cen, K. (2016). Physicochemical characterization of typical municipal solid wastes for fermentative hydrogen and methane co-production. Energy Conversion and Management, 117, 297–304.

35. Rinaldini, C. A., Mattarelli, E., & Golovitchev, V. (2013). Potential of the Miller cycle on a HSDI diesel automotive engine. Applied Energy, 112, 102–119.

36. Hau, E. (2013). Wind turbines: Fundamentals, technologies, application, economics (3rd ed.). Springer.

37. Burton, T., Jenkins, N., Sharpe, D., & Bossanyi, E. (2011). Wind energy handbook (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

38. Manwell, J. F., Branlard, E., McGowan, J. G., & Ram, B. (2024). Wind energy explained: Theory, design and application (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

39. Carta, J. A., Ramírez, P., & Velázquez, S. (2009). A review of wind speed probability distributions used in wind energy analysis: Case studies in the Canary Islands. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(5), 933–955.

40. Seguro, J. V., & Lambert, T. W. (2000). Modern estimation of the parameters of the Weibull wind speed distribution for wind energy analysis. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 85(1), 75–84.

41. Stevens, M. J. M., & Smulders, P. T. (1979). The estimation of the parameters of the Weibull wind speed distribution for wind energy utilization purposes. Wind Engineering, 3, 132–145.

42. International Electrotechnical Commission. (2017). IEC 61400-12-1: Power performance measurements of electricity producing wind turbines. IEC.

43. Global Wind Energy Council. (2023). Global wind report 2023. GWEC.

44. Global Wind Energy Council. (2024). Global wind report 2024. GWEC.

45. Global Wind Energy Council. (2022). Global wind report 2022. GWEC.

46. Hansen, M. O. L. (2013). Aerodynamics of wind turbines (2nd ed.). Routledge.

47. Sheng, X., Wan, S., Han, X., He, Y., & Wang, X. (2022). Impact of actual wind speed distribution on the fault characteristic of DFIG rotor winding asymmetry. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 71, 1–11.

48. Nugraha, A. D., Sitanggang, A. C., Susanto, B., Hajad, M., Rashyid, M. I., Utomo, R. S. B., Bagaskara, G., Putro, A. J. N., Nugroho, A. D., Wiranata, A., Nugroho, G., & Muflikhun, M. A. (2025). Aerodynamic performance enhancement of HAWTs via twist angle optimization: A combined critical review and simulation approach. Results in Engineering, 28, 107755.

49. Hansen, M. (2015). Aerodynamics of wind turbines. Routledge.

50. Postema, B., Verzijlbergh, R., van Dorp, P., Baas, P., & Jonker, H. J. J. (2025). Estimating long-term annual energy production from shorter-time-series data: Methods and verification with a 10-year large-eddy simulation of a large offshore wind farm. Wind Energy Science, 10(7), 1471–1487.

51. Aldaoudeyeh, A. I. (2024). Improved wind resource modeling using bimodal Weibull distribution. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 16(5).

52. Kihel, B. E., Elyamani, N. E. E. K., & Chillali, A. (2024). Wind energy potential assessment using the Weibull distribution method for future energy self-sufficiency. Scientific African, 26, e02129.

53. Wannakam, K., & Jiriwibhakorn, S. (2018). Evaluation of wind energy production using Weibull distribution and artificial neural networks. Energy Procedia, 138, 1110–1115.

54. Sekyere, C., Forson, F., & Akuffo, F. (2012). Technical and economic studies on lighting systems: A case for LED lanterns and CFLs in rural Ghana. Renewable Energy, 46, 282–288.

55. Polinder, H., van der Pijl, F. F., de Vilder, G.-J., & Tavner, P. J. (2006). Comparison of direct-drive and geared generator concepts for wind turbines. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 21(3), 725–733.

56. Zhao, L., Li, Z., Pei, Y., & Qu, L. (2024). Disentangled seasonal-trend representation of improved CEEMD-GRU joint model with entropy-driven reconstruction to forecast significant wave height. Renewable Energy, 226, 120345.

57. Xu, J., Zou, J., Ziegler, A. D., Wu, J., & Zeng, Z. (2023). What drives the change of capacity factor of wind turbine in the United States? Environmental Research Letters, 18(6), 064009.

58. Al-Khayat, M., & Al-Rasheedi, M. (2024). A new method for estimating the annual energy production of wind turbines in hot environments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 195, 114343.

59. Oyewole, O. L., Nwulu, N., & Okampo, E. J. (2024). Multi-objective optimal sizing and design of renewable and diesel-based autonomous microgrids with hydrogen storage considering economic, environmental, and social uncertainties. Renewable Energy, 231, 120987.

60. Bhattacharjee, A., & Shaikh, S. A. (2024). Corrigendum to “Design of a nature-inspired sun-tracking device in context of rural India”. Energy Reports, 11, 2555.

61. Ahmed, M. M., Robin, H. M., Shahadat, M. Z., & Masud, M. H. (2024). Innovative approaches for reducing wind turbine noise: A review from mechanical and aerodynamic perspective. Energy Reports, 13, 728–749.

62. Su, N., Bian, J., Peng, S., Chen, Z., & Xia, Y. (2023). Analytical optimal design of inerter-based vibration absorbers with negative stiffness balancing static amplification and dynamic reduction effects. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 192, 110235.

63. Seevers, S., Ward, R., Hutto, S., House, D., Zelenka, N., Perea, M. E. R., & Fonseca, D. J. (2024). Wind turbine noise reduction through blade retrofitting. Open Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 12(3), 75–88.

64. Shakya, P., Thomas, M., Seibi, A., Shekaramiz, M., & Masoum, M. A. S. (2024). Fluid-structure interaction and life prediction of small-scale damaged horizontal axis wind turbine blades. Results in Engineering, 23, 102388.

65. Aranizadeh, A., Shad, H. K., Vahidi, B., & Khorsandi, S. (2024). A novel small-scale wind-turbine blade failure detection according to monitored-data. Results in Engineering, 25, 103809.

66. Yildiz, N., Hemida, H., & Baniotopoulos, C. (2024). Operation, maintenance, and decommissioning cost in life-cycle cost analysis of floating wind turbines. Energies, 17(6), 1332.

67. Donnelly, O., Anderson, F., & Carroll, J. (2024). Operation and maintenance cost comparison between 15 MW direct-drive and medium-speed offshore wind turbines. Wind Energy Science, 9(6), 1345–1361.

68. Arnz, M., Göke, L., Thema, J., Wiese, F., Wulff, N., Kendziorski, M., Hainsch, K., Blechinger, P., & von Hirschhausen, C. (2024). Avoid, shift or improve passenger transport? Impacts on the energy system. Energy Strategy Reviews, 52, 101302.

69. Chakir, A., Tabaa, M., Moutaouakkil, F., Medromi, H., & Alami, K. (2022). Linear programming combined with mixed integer GA for energy management optimization of a PV–wind–battery hybrid system subject to residential demand response. AIP Conference Proceedings.

70. Sohail, K., & Farzaneh, H. (2023). Wind turbine minimum power loss optimization using non-linear mathematical programming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Energy Systems (pp. 511–518).

71. Abdullah, A. G., Utami, H., Gunawan, B., Ratmono, B. M., & Pasaribu, N. T. (2025). Multi-criteria decision-making for wind power project feasibility: Trends, techniques, and future directions. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 27, 100987.

72. Raju, S. K., Natesan, S., Alharbi, A. H., Kannan, S., Khafaga, D. S., Periyasamy, M., Eid, M. M., & El-Kenawy, E. M. (2024). AHP–VIKOR framework for selecting wind turbine materials with a focus on corrosion and efficiency. Scientific Reports, 14, 24071.

73. Mousavirad, S. J., & Alexandre, L. A. (2023). Energy-aware JPEG image compression: A multi-objective approach. Applied Soft Computing, 141, 110278.

74. Dong, G., Qin, J., Wu, C., Xu, C., & Yang, X. (2024). Reinforcement learning-enhanced genetic algorithm for wind farm layout optimization. arXiv.

75. Mestari, W. E., Cheggaga, N., Adli, F., Benallal, A., & Ilinca, A. (2025). Tuning parameters of genetic algorithms for wind farm optimization using the design of experiments method. Sustainability, 17(7), 3011.

76. Hussain, M., Fidge, C., Foo, E., & Jadidi, Z. (2023). Discovering a data interpreted Petri net model of industrial control systems for anomaly detection. Expert Systems with Applications, 230, 120511.

77. Mozzhegorova, Y., Ilinykh, G., & Korotaev, V. (2024). Life cycle assessment of a gas turbine installation. Energies, 17(2), 345.

78. Wang, Z., Tu, Y., Zhang, K., Han, Z., Cao, Y., & Zhou, D. (2023). An optimization framework for wind farm layout design using CFD-based Kriging model. arXiv.

79. Almeida, I., Lapa, G. V. P., Neto, A. G., & de Almeida, S. F. M. (2025). Design and extreme structural analysis of wind turbine blades: Beam and shell model comparison and discussion for a 10-MW reference turbine. Engineering Structures, 334, 120155.

80. Nebiewa, A. M., Abdelsalam, A. M., Sakr, I. M., El-Askary, W. A., Abdalla, H. A., & Ibrahim, K. A. (2025). Static load and structural analysis of a small horizontal axis wind turbine blade: Experimental and theoretical studies using the fluid–structure interaction method. Renewable Energy, 256, 124385.

81. Lee, S.-L., & Shin, S. J. (2021). Structural design optimization of a wind turbine blade using the genetic algorithm. Engineering Optimization, 54(12), 2053–2069.

82. Grujičić, M., Arakere, G., Subramanian, E. C., Sellappan, V., Vallejo, A., & Özen, M. (2009). Structural-response analysis, fatigue-life prediction, and material selection for 1 MW horizontal-axis wind-turbine blades. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 19(6), 790–801.

83. Zhang, X., Liu, J., Zhang, C., Shao, D., & Cai, Z. (2023). Innovation performance prediction of university student teams based on Bayesian networks. Sustainability, 15(3), 2335.

84. Zhang, J., Cheng, C., & Shen, Y. (2024). Recognizing the mapping relationship between wind power output and meteorological information at a province level by coupling GIS and CNN technologies. Applied Energy, 360, 122791.

85. Subbiah, S. S., Paramasivan, S. K., Arockiasamy, K., Saminathan, S., & Thangavel, M. (2022). Deep learning for wind speed forecasting using Bi-LSTM with selected features. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 35(3), 3829–3844.

86. Yao, H., Tan, Y., Hou, J., Liu, Y., Zhao, X., & Wang, X. (2023). Short-term wind speed forecasting based on the EEMD-GS-GRU model. Atmosphere, 14(4), 697.

87. Demirtop, A., & Sevli, O. (2024). Wind speed prediction using LSTM and ARIMA time series analysis models: A case study of Gelibolu. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 8(3), 524–535.

88. Alkan, N., & Kahraman, C. (2023). Wind turbine selection using interval-valued picture fuzzy TOPSIS. Selcuk University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 22, 25–38.

89. Sanaye, S., Yazdani, S., & Farvizi, A. (2025). Optimizing a straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine with computational fluid dynamics (CFD), artificial neural network (ANN), and genetic algorithm (GA). Energy Science & Engineering. Advance online publication.